 |
A
Brief History of The Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation
District
--
Summary of Central's Origins, Development and Operations --
PART
I ----- PART II
"Let
us be grateful to that host of pioneers who dared to dream and who,
because of their firm beliefs and continuing labors, brought about
the fulfillment of those dreams. Surely because of those pioneers,
the citizens of The Central Nebraska District, the State of Nebraska,
and the Nation as a whole are endowed with a rich heritage for which
all must be eternally thankful.
"May we who live today and the generations who follow dare
to dream and to labor with that greater faith for the future of
an area that once was part of the "Great American Desert."
-- From Central's 25th Anniversary Booklet published in 1958
Irrigation
System Modernization and Rehabilitation
Beginning in 1957, Central instituted a wooden structure replacement
program which was unique to the irrigation industry. Within 10 years,
3,000 original wooden structures were replaced with pre-cast concrete
structures. The new structures were cast in segments and installed
during the fall and winter. The segments were bolted together and
utilized gaskets similar to those used in paving projects as the
sealing agent.
The system was patented and irrigation projects from around the
world utilized this process which saved enormous savings of money,
time and labor over the previous practice of casting the structures
in place.
Central undertook a major rehabilitation project when it initiated
planning and design work on the E65 Canal system in 1969. Senator
Curtis of Minden led efforts to obtain a loan from the federal government
necessary to fund the project. As a result, Central obtained a $10
million interest-free loan from the Bureau of Reclamation in 1974
to invest -- along with $2.5 million in District funds -- in the
complete rehabilitation of the E65 system.
The Elwood Reservoir and the Curtis Dam and Pump Station were a
major part of the rehabilitation project. The dam, a compacted earth-fill
structure containing approximately 520,000 cu. yds. of material,
is 100 feet high and 2,460 feet long. Its face is protected by soil
cement riprap. The pump station houses three 300-hp pumps which
move water through a 96-inch conduit into the reservoir.
The reservoir can release up to 300 cfs of water to supplement the
E65 irrigation system’s diversion capacity. The reservoir
has an operating capacity of 24,715 acre-feet and a total capacity
of more than 40,000 acre-feet. Water is pumped into the reservoir
and then allowed to run out by gravity when needed.
In addition, Elwood Reservoir has become an excellent fishing lake.
Only wakeless boating is permitted and development along the shore
is prohibited, thus allowing fish and wildlife to thrive in the
habitat created by the lake. Several species of game fish are stocked
in the lake and the surface has become a favorite stopping place
for thousands of migrating waterfowl each spring and fall.
The E65 main canal was enlarged to raise its capacity from 280 cfs
to 638 cfs. In addition, laterals were enlarged and compacted, approximately
70 miles of pipelines were installed and control structures were
modernized and fitted with supervisory control equipment. Pipelines
replaced many old laterals and most of the remaining laterals were
reconstructed with compacted earth linings. The process involved
moving more than a million cubic yards of dirt during work on 26.6
miles of canal.
While the rehabilitation work proceeded on the E65 system, Central
applied for and received a second Small Project Loan for $10.3 million
from the Bureau of Reclamation in 1979. This loan and $2.5 million
in District funds were used for the rehabilitation of the Phelps
Canal system. The project involved the installation of 17 new structures
and cleanout, compaction, reshaping and erosion protection on 39
miles of main canal. In addition, more than half of the 250 miles
of laterals were completely replaced, rehabilitated or improved
by 1986.
Work continues as funds become available to improve the remaining
small laterals and structures not included in the main project.
Several small, inefficient laterals were
abandoned in favor of serving irrigators in those areas with District
wells. Finally, many of the Phelps Canal structures were fitted
with supervisory control capability.
Central completed an improvement project on the E67 Canal in 2003.
The project replaced almost all of the E67 Canal system's open laterals
with 18 miles of buried pipeline and 2.8 miles of membrane lining
in the head end of the main canal. The $2.7 million project will
provide two-week delivery rotations (rather than the three-week
rotation that had been in place since the canal was added to Central's
system in 1954), and will reduce diversions into the canal by 25
to 30 percent.
Conjunctive
Use
An important part of the rehabilitation projects was the attention
given to designing, incorporating and improving the “conjunctive
use” aspect of Central’s system.
Within the context of Central’s system, conjunctive
use is the recognition of the hydrologic relationship between
surface water irrigation and ground water resources and the
effective, efficient use and management of both resources
to produce sustainable social, economic and environmental
benefits. In its Strategic Plan, conjunctive use is an important
part of Central's integrated water resource management objectives.
The Strategic Plan states that “Central will prepare
an economic and technological analysis of conjunctive uses
of water resources supporting a fair and equitable price for
ground water recharge,” and “will continue to
monitor and evaluate ground water levels throughout the service
area for the purpose of sustaining recharge benefits of the
irrigation system and addressing possible detrimental effects.”
During the planning stages for the E65 rehabilitation project, computer
ground water modeling studies of the system resulted in a design
that provides recharge where ground water development (irrigation
wells) is heavy and a lined system, or pipelines, where irrigation
comes mainly from the surface system. The result has been a generally
stable water table beneath and adjacent to Central’s service
area.
The District’s efforts marked the first time in Nebraska that
an irrigation system was designed to address the water supply and
the needs of both surface and ground water irrigators. Central is
committed to the development of improvements in the area of conjunctive
use. Central personnel monitors a system of 137 observation wells
throughout the service area, enabling the District to compile the
necessary data for continued evaluation of ground water levels.
Data from the U.S. Geological Survey and the Conservation and Survey
Division of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln show that the water
table beneath Central’s service area has risen since pre-development
by 10 feet to more than 50 feet. Similar data from counties just
outside Central’s service area show just the opposite -- declines
in the ground water table of five to more than 30 feet in the last
50 years (see Map 4).
In recognition of this relationship between surface and ground water,
Central actively promoted legislation which would provide legal
recognition of water rights for incidental underground water storage
and recovery. Central’s application to the Nebraska Department
of Water Resources for a water right pertaining to incidental ground
water recharge for areas in Gosper, Phelps and Kearney counties
was approved in 1986 (known as the U-2 application). Similar water
rights for portions of Lincoln, Dawson and Frontier counties were
approved in 1989 (U-12). As mentioned earlier, more than 310,000
acres irrigated by wells in these areas receive documented recharge
benefits from Central’s system.
Canaday
Steam Plant
The
Canaday Steam Plant, a 100-megawatt natural-gas-fired electric generation
station, was completed and placed into service on May 31, 1958.
Built at a cost of $15.5 million, the plant was built to fill a
void in Nebraska's electrical generating ability in the late 1950s
and 1960s. The plant site -- southeast of Lexington near Central's
Supply Canal -- was selected because of the easy access to water
to cool the plant's condensers and because it was near existing
natural gas pipelines.
The
plant was automated in 1973, a process that reduced the need for
plant operators from four per shift to two. A data acquisition system
that monitored important plant functions was installed to enable
the plant to operate more efficiently. More automation was installed
in 1991 and today almost all operations are done by computer, replacing
pneumatic operations with electrical operations.
As
other power plants were constructed in Nebraska, Canaday's on-line
time gradually declined in the 1980s. The plant was placed in layup
status in October, 1994 and sold to the Nebraska Public Power District
in March, 1995. The plant now operates as necessary to meet demands
for power.
Kingsley
Hydroplant
In
1974, during an oil embargo by the Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries, the CH2M Hill engineering firm reported to
the boards of directors of Central and NPPD that, "... the
dramatic increase in fossil fuel costs over the past year has greatly
improved the feasibility of a hydroplant at Kingsley Dam. In fact,
the project now appears to have sufficient merit so that we are
recommending starting design rather than preparing a feasibility
study to refine the results of a 1973 reconnaissance and report."
The
two Districts agreed and preliminary design work on the plant started
later that year. Central applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission in 1979 for approval to build the plant. Tri-State G&T
of Denver and the National Wildlife Federation intervened to object
to the proposed plant, but later withdrew their objections. Negotiations
between Central and NPPD for sale of the power were completed in
1980 and construction began in the fall of 1981.
An
economic recession at the time had slowed construction and industrial
production. The slowdown contributed to keen competition among manufacturers
of electrical components and construction companies, which resulted
in bids that were well below engineer's estimates. Instead of a
$60 million plant, Kingsley was constructed at a cost of just over
$49 million. Another $13 million was saved during construction of
the plant as a result of financing arrangements with NPPD related
to the bond market.
The
plant was dedicated on Oct. 17, 1984 and went on-line in early November,
eight months ahead of schedule.
The
immense spray of water emitted through the Howell-Bunger bypass
valve is a noted feature of the plant. Originally installed as a
means by which water could be released through the plant without
running it through the turbine, the bypass valve is now used on
a regular basis during the summer to aerate the water entering Lake
Ogallala and maintain the dissolved oxygen level in the water for
the benefit of the lake's trout population.
Operation
of the hydroplant, like other Central hydroplants, is controlled
from the Gothenburg Control Center.
History
in the Project Area
The Supply Canal runs through territory rich in Nebraska history.
The Oregon Trail reached the Platte River at the site of Fort Kearny
north of the present city of Minden. The route of the Supply Canal
roughly parallels the Oregon Trail as it followed the south bank of
the river to the confluence of the North and South Platte Rivers near
the city of North Platte. The trail continued along the south side
of the South Platte River to a site near Big Springs where it crossed
the river on its route to the North Platte River at Ash Hollow.
The stretch of the Platte Valley between the headgates of the Supply
Canal and the headgates of the Phelps Canal is rich in history. Historical
markers and monuments along the roads in this area mark the route
of the Oregon Trail and the Pony Express, sites where Pony Express
stations once stood and the site of the first Masonic Lodge in Lincoln
County.
Another marker can be found on a county road just north of the Supply
Canal’s Cottonwood Canyon Lake near Maxwell. A stone soldier
in 1860s-era military uniform stands guard over the site of old Fort
McPherson, one of the military outposts established to protect travelers
along the Oregon Trail and settlers throughout the area.
Originally established in 1863 as Cantonment McKean, the outpost was
located at a strategic point on the Oregon Trail. It was the on the
route of the first transcontinental telegraph line, a stop-over point
for stagecoach lines and the Pony Express and near the tracks of the
Union Pacific Railroad. In 1864 the name of the outpost was changed
to Fort Cottonwood, a name taken from nearby Cottonwood Canyon, which
was notable for its growth of trees (trees were rare on the prairie),
a flowing spring and as a favorite camp site for Indians traveling
through the valley. In 1866 the fort was renamed for James B. McPherson,
a U.S. major general killed during the siege of Atlanta in the Civil
War.
Fort McPherson eventually became the base for five companies of cavalry.
The fort itself was not the stockade-type enclosure popularized in
Hollywood westerns. Five barracks -- two were constructed of logs,
the other three were frame structures -- were arranged in a quadrangle
which was 800 feet long and 560 feet wide. The grounds of the military
reservation covered 19,500 acres. The cavalry troops stationed there
were involved in a number of actions against Indians, including a
military response to attacks in the Platte Valley that started with
the “Plum Creek Massacre” on Aug. 6, 1864. Nine men in
a freight wagon train were killed and two women and two children were
taken captive in the attack which occurred near the Platte River in
northwest Phelps County.
The Cheyenne, Arapahoe and Brule launched concerted attacks on stagecoaches,
emigrants' wagon trains, stagecoach stations and ranches all along
the central and west Platte Valley in 1864-65 until the army could
halt the raids.
The U.S. Cavalry maintained a presence at the fort until 1880 when
it was officially abandoned. The U.P. Railroad had been completed
in 1869 and military actions against the Indians, particularly in
1876-77, had broken the power of the Plains Indians and all but ended
the threat of attacks against settlers. In 1887, the lands of the
reservation were transferred from the War Department to the Department
of the Interior.
Fort McPherson National Cemetery was established in 1873 near the
site of the fort. There have been almost 6,000 burials at the cemetery,
including veterans of the Indian, Civil, Spanish-American, Korean
and Vietnam wars as well as both World Wars. Three Medal of Honor
recipients are interred here, as are the remains of 584 unknown soldiers.
The cemetery is also the final resting place for 28 soldiers killed
in the “Grattan Massacre” which occurred eight miles east
of Fort Laramie in August, 1854. Soldiers under the command of Lt.
John Grattan were summoned by members of a passing Mormon wagon train
to retrieve a cow that had wandered from the wagon train into a nearby
Indian village where it was killed and butchered. Lt. Grattan arrived
with his soldiers and unsuccessfully attempted to discover who was
responsible for killing the cow. As a result, in what might be termed
an ill-advised over-reaction, Lt. Grattan ordered his men to open
fire, killing the village chief. A brief, but furious battle erupted
during which Lt. Grattan and all 28 of his men were killed.
Originally interred at Ft. Laramie, the bodies were exhumed from their
graves in Wyoming after Ft. Laramie was abandoned in 1890 and re-interred
in a common grave at Fort McPherson cemetery. Lt. Grattan is buried
at Ft. Leavenworth National Cemetery in Kansas.
Another historical site, Sioux Lookout, lies just south of the Diversion
Dam. Indians were known to use the bluff, which affords a view for
long distances up and down the Platte Valley, to spot travelers on
the Oregon Trail. Prior to the arrival of white settlers, the Pawnee
Indians used the bluff to keep watch for their Sioux enemies until
the Sioux drove the Pawnee out of the Platte Valley.
The Oregon Trail reached the Platte River at the site of Ft. Kearny
north of the present city of Minden. It then followed the south bank
of the river through the Fort McPherson area. At the confluence of
the North Platte and South Platte Rivers, the trail followed the south
bank of the South Platte River to a site near Big Springs. Here it
crossed the South Platte River and the tableland and descended to
the North Platte River at Ash Hollow near the present town of Lewellen.
Ash Hollow is an important historical site for several reasons. It
was difficult to get down to the valley from the high tableland and
the descent was named “Windlass Hill,” descriptive of
the manner in which the covered wagons were lowered down the steep
incline (a windlass is a simple winch). After reaching the valley
floor, the pioneer travelers stopped to rest their stock and make
necessary repairs. Good supplies of wood and water were readily available.
A log cabin built by trappers around 1845 became an unofficial post
office with people writing messages and leaving them to be picked
up and transported by the next traveler going in the opposite direction.
Archeological discoveries of artifacts from ancient cultures indicate
that Ash Hollow was a favorite gathering place for primitive man long
before the Oregon Trail.
It is in this area that a significant battle with Indians took place
in 1855. After the Grattan incident, the Indians terrorized travelers
along the valley. General William S. Harney was sent to restore peace
with a force of 1,200 men. His soldiers decimated a large band of
Indians near Ash Hollow in what is sometimes called the Battle of
Blue Water (it occurred about six miles northwest of Ash Hollow on
Blue Water Creek). This battle and General Harney’s subsequent
harsh treatment of the Indians caused a great deal of trouble until
1876 when the Sioux had been driven from the region and their leaders
were either in Canada or confined to reservations.
Ogallala, eight miles south of Kingsley Dam, was one of the country’s
most important “cow towns” from about 1874 to 1884. During
its 10 years as a trail town, Ogallala was a more important cattle
shipping point and outfitting center than Dodge City, Kansas. In addition,
it soon developed as an important stop on the new trails taking cattle
up to the Dakotas and Montana. Being a rough-and-tumble trail-end
town where cowboys let off steam built up during months on the trail,
it naturally had need for its own “Boot Hill” cemetery.
Seventeen homicides or otherwise violent deaths were recorded in Ogallala
during these 10 years, during which the town’s permanent population
never exceeded 100 people.
In 1878, as the Cheyenne Indians made their famous flight from Oklahoma
Indian Territory to the north, the settlers and the U.S. Army tried
to intercept them. A major line of defense was along the Union Pacific
railroad, but the Indians slipped through the line near Ogallala and
spent several months in the Sandhills. One part of the group was finally
taken to Fort Robinson, while the others escaped to Montana.
The
Road to Relicensing: Summary of the FERC Relicensing Process
On June 21, 1984, the Central filed an application with the FERC for
a new license to operate its hydroelectric project. The District was
subsequently notified on Dec. 7, 1984 that the application was deficient
(it lacked sufficient studies on the project's impact on endangered
species) and was given a 90-day extension. However, due to the complex,
technical nature of the required studies, Central was granted additional
time to conduct the studies. A new deadline was set for May 5, 1990
and the necessary documents were filed on time.
While the studies were being conducted, Central’s original 50-year
license expired in 1987. According to the Federal Power Act, the FERC
is required to issue an annual license under the conditions of the
existing license until a new license is issued. Central has been operating
under these interim licenses since the expiration of its long-term
license.
The FERC issued its first Draft Environmental Impact Statement in
early 1992, but it drew criticism because of the high costs to farmers
and rate-payers that would have resulted from implementation of proposals
in the document. Despite aspects of the draft statement that were
called “infeasible, excessive or too expensive,” supporters
from Central’s area indicated general satisfaction with the
document if some of the deficiencies could be corrected. However,
representatives of wildlife groups criticized the document and demanded
that it be completely redone to make more allowances to their concerns.
In June, 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency issued its opinion
of the DEIS, saying the document did not “adequately assess
the potentially significant environmental effect, nor does it identify
and analyze all reasonable alternatives.” The EPA recommended
that a new DEIS be prepared.
Subsequently, Nebraska parties to the relicensing process, with the
leadership of Governor Ben Nelson, developed a relicensing plan centered
around a “block-of-water” concept or environmental account.
The plan would replace the rigid river flow proposals in the FERC’s
DEIS with a more flexible plan which sets aside a block of water in
Lake McConaughy for wildlife habitat purposes. An environmental account
manager (originally the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, but later
designated to be a representative of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
would determine when and how much water to release from the environmental
account for wildlife purposes.
Governor Nelson signed the plan and it was subsequently endorsed by
Central’s board of directors. The plan was submitted to the
FERC on Oct. 1, 1992. Other parties, including the Nebraska Water
Users, the Big Mac Sportsmen’s Club and NPPD also endorsed the
plan.
On March 30, 1994, the FERC released its revised DEIS. FERC staff
concluded that a modified Nebraska Plan “offers the best overall
balance among the resource values, while providing adequate protection
for threatened and endangered species.” However, Central was
deeply concerned by the costs associated with mitigation and enhancements
required by the RDEIS.
Nebraska, Wyoming and Colorado entered into a Memorandum of Agreement
with the U.S. Department of the Interior in June, 1994 to develop
a basinwide solution to sharing responsibility for protecting endangered
species along the Platte River. The process nearly collapsed in January,
1996 after federal officials criticized the states' plans for providing
water for endangered species habitat.
The following month, the FERC released its biological assessment of
the Platte River projects and began the consultation process associated
with the Endangered Species Act. The Nebraska Plan was still listed
as the FERC's preferred licensing alternative.
In December, 1996, the FWS issued a draft biological opinion of the
FERC's biological assessment. The FWS found jeopardy for endangered
species and recommended two "reasonable and prudent" alternatives
for resolving ESA issues. One of the alternatives gives consideration
to an agreement between the three states and Interior. The other would
have forced Nebraska's power districts to shoulder a disproportionate
share of the burden for providing water and habitat for endangered
species.
In May, 1997, the states and Interior reached an agreement on a basin-wide
plan for endangered species. A Cooperative Agreement that lays out
the approach to providing money, land and water to meet endangered
species' habitat needs was subsequently signed on July 1, 1997.
On January 15, 1998, the parties involved in negotiations over federal
license conditions announced that a settlement had had been reached
that covered all fish and wildlife-related issues connected with the
relicensing of hydroelectric facilities operated by Central and NPPD.
The Cooperative Agreement between the three states and the federal
government was an important part of the settlement reached by Central,
NPPD, the Whooping Crane Trust, National Audubon Society, Nebraska
Water Users, the states of Colorado and Wyoming and the U.S. Department
of the Interior.
Fourteen years of effort culminated on July 29, 1998 when the FERC
approved the relicensing settlement agreement and issued a new 40-year
license to the Central District. The settlement is an important part
of comprehensive water resource management and endangered species
habitat protection in the Platte River basin. The new license is part
of an integrated approach to managing water in the Platte basin that
provides regulatory certainty to Central and its customers and allows
adaptive management in response to new information about issues involved
in the relicensing and water resources management process.
FERC Chairman James Hoecker said, "All those who participated
in achieving this extraordinary agreement should take pride in this
far-reaching settlement. It is the result of a great deal of hard
work and demonstrated good will and illustrates the growing possibility
of reaching settlements in cases where there are two or more states
involved and many interests to be protected."
The effort to develop a recovery implementation program by parties
to the Cooperative Agreement required a extension to the original
term of the agreement, which expired on June 30, 2000. Because of
the complexity of the issues and several new issues that developed
during the process, the three states and the federal government agreed
to extend the term of the Cooperative Agreement to June 30, 2003.
Water-related issues will continue to be controversial. Just as early
settlers in the “Old West” fought over the possession
of water holes, streams and springs because, “This here water
hole’s not big enough for the both of us,” so do the battles
over water continue today. Although the reasons may have changed and
the battles take place in the court room instead of on the dusty plains,
disagreements over how water resources are allocated and utilized
are not likely to abate soon.
Central intends to move forward in the area of integrated water management.
As outlined in the its Strategic Plan and previously mentioned in
this booklet’s Introduction, it is Central’s goal to continue
to “serve the agricultural-based community in south-central
Nebraska by protecting and utilizing in a sustainable and ecologically
balanced manner all of the natural resources available to us to provide
reliable and reasonably priced surface water irrigation and ground
water recharge while producing electric power and preserving and enhancing
our quality of life and the natural environment in which we live ...
It is important that these activities be undertaken with the abiding
conviction in, and understanding of, our overriding obligation to
be good stewards of the region's environment and its land and water
resources.” RETURN
TO PART I
|
 |